Practical example

Peer instruction - student interaction in lectures too

Teachers
Prof Dr Karsten Hoechstetter
Last update
University(s)
Subject group(s)
Target group(s)
Format | Mode

|

Peer instruction units are short units lasting approx. 10 minutes that are carried out once or several times during a lecture. The starting point is a multiple-choice question that is addressed to the students via the projector. Typically, this is a comprehension question on current material that addresses a topic that students find difficult to understand or about which there are often student misconceptions. Students are given a short time to think about the correct answer on their own and then vote on it anonymously. The result of the vote is usually displayed or announced. This is followed by 3-5 minutes in which the students discuss the question with the person sitting next to them, exchange arguments for and against the various possible answers and try to identify errors in their own or their fellow student's reasoning. This time is therefore a time of active learning for the students. A second vote concludes the discussion phase. Now the correct answer is usually chosen more often, which documents the students' learning process. Afterwards, both the correct answer and the misconceptions underlying the incorrect answers are discussed in plenary.

The challenge of teaching

Goals of your practical example

Peer instruction allows students to explain aspects of the subject matter to each other during the lecture that are known (from studies or the teacher's experience) to still cause problems even after the teacher has explained them. This gives the lecture added value that cannot be obtained in any other way (e.g. reading literature, videos). The method also loosens up the lecture time - both for students and for the teacher. It increases students' motivation and self-competence and creates a pleasant learning environment. The method can be integrated into the lecture in a low-threshold manner without major restructuring of the course.
The following challenges can thus be met:

  • Known misconceptions about learning content often become apparent too late (sometimes only in the exam)
  • Students need different individual explanations for the same learning content
  • Large frontal lectures without interaction and active participation of the students provide little added value compared to independent learning material development

Time frame: 10 minutes per unit during the lecture

  • Student participation is more difficult in large lectures

The complete description of the concept can be found on the website of the INSPIRE project of the EAH Jena.

Prerequisites for implementation

Procedure

Material for the practical example

Helpful links and sources

Your suggestion or question

We hope that the practical examples will be viewed critically, utilised and developed further and thus remain alive. Therefore, please use the comment function to give your assessment of this practical example. Share your experiences in the implementation or refer to similar didactic methods (please include references or links). 

Your assessment will first be checked by us and then approved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Contact person for the teaching concept

Picture of Charlotte Steinke

Charlotte Steinke

Contact us

Selection of topics